A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a passenger vehicle B with low investment.

On August 18, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:00, and proceeded two lanes in front of the D gas station in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, in accordance with the two-lanes of the D gas station in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-do.

At the same time, a passenger car was under the Fgallon of the victim E (n.e., 52 years old) driving in the front of the same lane, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and properly operate the operation and steering gear for the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle while driving it as it is and received the back portion of the passenger vehicle damaged by the defendant's fault.

As a result, the Defendant suffered salt, tension, etc. from the victim due to the above occupational negligence during the two-day period of medical treatment, and at the same time escaped without necessary measures, such as immediately leaving the damaged vehicle back to the repair cost of KRW 2,201,13, such as back criminal seal, and immediately leaving the damaged vehicle back to the damaged vehicle.

2. The Defendant was driving a motor vehicle with the highest speed within approximately 6 km from the road before the new Sincheon-si Sincheon-si's trade name in the Dong-si in Gyeonggi-do to the road before the office of the Dong-gu's office in the same city and the road before the office of the Dong-gu's office in the same city.

3. The Defendant, at around 22:50 on the same day, driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on the grounds that he/she was investigated by G District Zone of the Pocheon Police Station G District of the Pocheon Police Station and the face of which is red and walked properly or is unable to walk properly.

Due to reasonable grounds to determine the person, H was required to respond to the alcohol testing three times by the police officer belonging to the said district group.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1...