logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.05.12 2015재고단8
간통
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant was a spouse who completed the marriage report with C on December 11, 1997. However, on June 11, 201, the Defendant conspired with A over nine occasions, as indicated in the annexed crime list, as between June 11, 2010 and June 17, 2010, as well as the cross-competence with A.

2. The prosecutor charged a public prosecution by applying Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act to the above charged facts, and the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that the above provision is unconstitutional (the Constitutional Court Decision 2009Hun-Ba17,205, 2010Hun-Ba194, 2011Hun-Ba4, 2012Hun-Ba57, 255, 411, 2013Hun-Ba139, 161, 267, 276, 342, 365, 2014Hun-Ba53, 464, 201Hun-Ba31, 2014Hun-Ba4, 2014Hun-Ba4, 2014, 2014Hun-Ba4, which is retroactively null and void.

[However, since Article 241 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 293 of Oct. 30, 2008) was decided not to violate the Constitution on Oct. 30, 2008, Article 241 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 293 of Sep. 18, 1953), the above provision of the Act was invalidated retroactively on Oct. 31, 2008).

arrow