Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant was a spouse who completed the marriage report with C on December 11, 1997. However, on June 11, 201, the Defendant conspired with A over nine occasions, as indicated in the annexed crime list, as between June 11, 2010 and June 17, 2010, as well as the cross-competence with A.
2. The prosecutor charged a public prosecution by applying Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act to the above charged facts, and the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that the above provision is unconstitutional (the Constitutional Court Decision 2009Hun-Ba17,205, 2010Hun-Ba194, 2011Hun-Ba4, 2012Hun-Ba57, 255, 411, 2013Hun-Ba139, 161, 267, 276, 342, 365, 2014Hun-Ba53, 464, 201Hun-Ba31, 2014Hun-Ba4, 2014Hun-Ba4, 2014, 2014Hun-Ba4, which is retroactively null and void.
[However, since Article 241 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 293 of Oct. 30, 2008) was decided not to violate the Constitution on Oct. 30, 2008, Article 241 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 293 of Sep. 18, 1953), the above provision of the Act was invalidated retroactively on Oct. 31, 2008).