logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.09 2017고정172
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-Scar.

On November 23, 2016, around 08:55, the Defendant turned back at a speed of about 5 km from the front side road of the Mansan-si, Ansan-si.

A person engaged in driving service, who has a duty of care to check the safety of the course by checking the front, rear, and left and left well, neglected to do so, and neglected to do so on the rear side of the said vehicle and received the parts of the victim E (the age 41)'s left side part of the victim E (the age 41) and the part of the elbel part of the said vehicle as the rear part of the said vehicle.

The Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in the part of the elbow part requiring treatment for about 14 days by negligence in the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. E’s statement (Evidence 11 of the evidence list);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Casual and accident-related video CDs;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's medical certificate and inquiry letter of fact [the defendant and his defense counsel did not have any actual shock of the victim's side glass and elbow part by standing immediately after hearing the voice of the victim who tried to proceed behind the accident at the time of the accident in this case, and even if the defendant's family shocks, it is not guilty because the victim did not suffer any injury, or that the relation between the injury and the accident in this case is not recognized, in view of the speed of the car, etc.

However, in full view of the above adopted evidence, in particular the victim E’s consistent statement, diagnosis statement, and reply statement of fact-finding, etc., the part of the victim’s elbow part was shocked with the back of the above vehicle while the defendant did not properly examine the back as stated in the above criminal facts. As a result, the victim was diagnosed on November 25, 2016 that there was a need for approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in the part of the elbow part from the F-type Capital (Proceedings G). From that time, the victim was diagnosed that approximately two weeks of medical treatment is necessary.

arrow