logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.10.31 2013고단1083
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on May 3, 2008 with a 0.089% alcohol concentration on May 3, 2008 and with a 0.140% alcohol concentration on November 6, 2008 and violated the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on not less than two occasions.

Around 05:50 on June 22, 2013, the Defendant driven a car between B and B while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.10% without a driver’s license, on the road of the 119 Safety Center in the Godong-Gu, Young-gu, Young-si, Gosi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol, statement in the circumstance of a drinking driver, and photograph at the time of

1. An inquiry into driver's licenses and details of revocation of driver's licenses, and disqualified meetings of the main office;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records, reply reports (A), investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. An order to attend a course is rendered for not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow