A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2010, the Defendant was released on July 29, 201 and passed on September 15, 201, when he was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court for a period of one year and two months.

1. C, D, E, and the Defendant were willing to commit the c, D, and E jointly with each other to commit the c, D, and E with intent to commit the c, D, and E with intent to take charge of the c, D’s role of deceiving the victim by telephone, C’s role of finding the money deposited by the victim, and the Defendant and E’s role of driving or viewing the vehicle.

On May 5, 2012, the Defendant against the victim F, together with C, D, and E, on the roads in front of the H Elementary School located in Chungcheongnam-gun G, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun on May 15, 2012, D calls from the victim F to the victim F, and “The Economic Team I of the Gangnam-gu Police Station. It is possible to file an application for payment of KRW 950,000 won of the amount of damage in connection with the Internet product fraud case before the example. If money is deposited to the account of the beneficiary, it may be returned including the amount of damage and KRW 950,000.”

However, even if the defendant and C, etc. receive money from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to return it.

The Defendant, in collusion with C, D, and E, by deceiving the victim, and then deceiving the victim through deposit of KRW 4,018,173 from the National Bank Account (K) in the name of J.

B. On May 9, 2012, the Defendant against the victim L, together with C, D, and E, and on the road front of the branch of the national bank located in the Doggs of the Doggs of the Dogs of the Dogs of the Dogs of the Dogs of the Sigs of the Dogs of the Republic of Korea on May 19, 2012, D calls the victim L to return the amount of damage to the court in relation to the case where the Internet goods was committed prior to the example. It is possible to receive refund including the amount of damage

However, even if the defendant and C, etc. receive money from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to return it.