Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 24, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Western District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and was finally decided on November 1, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

On October 18, 2019, at the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 02:10, the Defendant: (a) caused the Defendant, who was divingd on the road under the influence of alcohol and was called for 112 reports; and (b) caused the Defendant, the Gyeong-gu Police Station affiliated with the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station, which received and called the report of 112, and recommended him to return home; and (c) caused the Defendant’s complaint to the Defendant, and the Defendant “Is the police officer, Is the police officer, Is the son, Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is, Is Is Is Is Is yous Is yous Is yous yous yous Is yous Is yous Is yous yous Is yous yous Is yous yous Is yous yous Is yous Is yous yous Is yous yous Is you

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site documentary evidence and video CDs;

1. Previouss before and after judgments: Criminal records, references to criminal records, reports on the results of confirmation before and after dispositions, decisions, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is highly likely that the instant crime has been committed while being under criminal trial for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) stated in the criminal records stated in the judgment on the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is necessary to strictly punish crimes that interfere with the performance of official duties as crimes that interfere with the legitimate exercise of public authority.

The defendant is faced with violence.

However, the attitude of the defendant's wrong and reflect.

The record of the criminal records in the judgment that has ex post concurrent crimes.