All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable that the sentence against the Defendants of the lower court (two years of suspended sentence in October, probation, community service, 200 hours in prison, Defendant B: 2 years of suspended sentence in October, probation, 40 hours in prison, 160 hours in prison, 160 hours in prison) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants’ act is an offense against the public authority that duly enforces the law, and requires strict punishment for the sake of the people’s trust in the public authority. All the Defendants, including the power of sentence, have several criminal records, and Defendant B has the power to be punished for the violation of the Road Traffic Act. In addition, considering the motive and background leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the degree of injury by the damaged police officer, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, character, conduct, and environment, the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants’ above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.