beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 22, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, and the Defendant’s land and ground buildings (k Center) in the Essung city owned by the Defendant, setting the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 3,000,000 (value-added Tax Separate), and the lease period of KRW 7 years, and stipulated that “The Plaintiff may use the real network on the remaining space on the side of the road in front of the building for the purpose of Sejong Vice General within the extent permitted by the Act” as a special agreement.
B. On May 13, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant finally revised the said lease agreement with the following content:
(hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”). The leased object: The rent of 2,50,000 square meters per month (including rent for the Deputy Director, value-added tax separate, and subsequent payment), and the rent for the third Deputy Director: the period from the commencement date of business to December 14, 2012: the special agreement from December 14, 2012 to December 14, 2017;
2. The third Deputy Director, and the name of the permission shall be the lessor;
Expenses that may be incurred at the time of permission by the Deputy Director (expenses for altering the purpose of use, and installing fences, etc.) shall be borne half in consultation between the lessor and the lessee.
(a) 14. A lessor performs the duty of a lessor related to a premium so that the lessee can operate his/her business stably;
(b) This Agreement was made under the agreement between a lessor and a lessee, and thus, if the agreement is not complied with, both a lessor and a lessee are liable for compensation. (b) This Agreement was made under the agreement.
(one million won per annum). (c)
Under the instant lease agreement, the Defendant reported the installation of wastewater discharge facilities necessary for the business of the Deputy Director, and the chemical Mayor accepted the said report on June 21, 2013.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4 evidence, Gap 10-2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The defendant alleged by the plaintiff shall be the third Deputy Director among the real estate of this case.