A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 12. 23. 00:45 경 용인시 B에 있는 ‘C 편의점 ’에서, 위 편의점 종업원인 피해자 D(21 세) 과 시비하던 중 화가 나 손으로 피해자의 어깨 부분을 밀치고 발로 피해자의 다리 부분을 1회 걷어찬 다음 피해자에게 밖으로 나오라 고 하여 위 편의점 뒤편 쓰레기 분리수거 장으로 이동하여 손에 쥔 휴대폰으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수 회 때리고, 손으로 피해자의 옷을 잡아당겨 피해자를 바닥에 넘어지게 하고, 그곳에 있던 위험한 물건인 폐 형광등으로 피해자의 왼쪽 허리와 양 손을 때리고, 바닥에 넘어진 피해자의 얼굴과 몸을 주먹으로 때려 피해자에게 약 14일 간의 치료가 필요한 얼굴 타박상 등을 가하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A E-document;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, dangerous objects, and field photographs of the persons under consideration;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances are considered in favor of sentencing) of the mitigated amount;

1. It is reasonable to view that the Defendant’s liability for the crime of using dangerous articles with the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following sentencing has been repeated in favorable circumstances to be considered in mind) is not mitigated. However, the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflects his face, and the Defendant committed the instant crime contingently under the influence of somewhat drunk, the Defendant committed the instant crime in the process of trial, the victim’s recovery during the trial, and the victim did not be punished by simply agreement, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the same type of crime and the suspension of execution.