beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the determination of the defendant's assertion added in the appellate court, and therefore, it is identical to the part against the plaintiff and the defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case as it is in accordance
2. The defendant asserts that the body of the defendant's name stated in the loan certificate (Evidence A No. 3) for KRW 10 million submitted by the plaintiff is not the body of the defendant, but the above loan certificate was forged.
In light of the following circumstances, the defendant's signature entered in the loan certificate No. 3 and the defendant's signature entered in the loan certificate No. 1-1, i.e., the document's signature and seal affixed by the defendant on January 11, 2017 and the defendant's seal affixed on the loan certificate No. 3 are identical to the document's signature and seal affixed by the defendant on the statement of reasons for appeal No. 3, and whether the document's authenticity is recognized or not, based on the overall purport of all evidentiary materials and arguments (see Supreme Court Decision 87Meu3147, Dec. 13, 198). The defendant's signature and seal affixed to the document's signature and seal affixed by the defendant on January 11, 2017 and the document's seal affixed by the defendant's signature and seal affixed to the document's statement of reasons for appeal No. 3 are recognized as authentic in its establishment, and there is no other evidence to prove that the above defendant's signature and seal affixed to the above loan certificate is forged.
3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition.