The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) C is the owner of B vehicle and is obligated to subscribe to mandatory insurance under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant as the owner of the instant vehicle and found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the owner of the B vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) is E, but distributed regardless of his intention; (b) the defendant purchased the instant vehicle on the Internet on March through April 2009, and (c) the defendant was under control on the part of the owner of the instant vehicle on July 6, 2009, while driving the instant vehicle (on July 6, 2009, page 44 of the Investigation Record). Since the defendant operated the instant vehicle as the owner of the instant vehicle, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.