logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.18 2014가단12328
건물명도및방해물제거
Text

1. The Defendants indicate the attached drawings among the first floor of the F apartment underground of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government;

(a)each of the following: 1, 2, 3, 4, 21, 22, and 1:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment (hereinafter “instant building”) is an aggregate building of the 4th underground floor and the 16th ground floor, which is defined in the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings, composed of sales facilities and neighborhood living facilities, etc. from the 1st to the 3rd ground, and apartment from the 4th to the 16th ground.

B. The Plaintiff is a co-owner of 122 rooms, including subparagraph 2 of the first floor of the instant building. In the instant building, Defendant B is a co-owner of the first floor of the underground floor of the instant building; Defendant C is a co-owner of the first floor of the underground floor of the instant building; Defendant C is a co-owner of the first floor of the underground floor of the first floor of the instant building; Defendant D is a co-owner of the first floor of the first floor

On the other hand, with respect to the 61 units, including No. 100 units of the underground floor of the instant building, the Defendants delegated the right to lease the units of the said units to G, a sectional owner of the 1/2 shares of each of the above units.

H is divided ownership of 1/2 shares in G and each of the above units.

다. I, J은 G, H와 2010. 1. 27. 피고들 구분소유인 위 각 호실을 포함하여 이 사건 건물 지하층 제비 100~122, 136~180, 181A~181G 75개 호실에 관하여 임대차보증금 7,500만 원, 월차임 800만 원으로 하는 내용의 임대차계약을 체결하고, 2010. 2. 18.경 H, G로부터 위 임차 부분을 인도받아 그 무렵부터 이 사건 변론종결일 현재까지 직업전문학교를 운영하여 왔는데, 이 사건 건물 지하층 복도의 일부인 주문 제1항 기재 ㉮ 내지 ㉸ 부분 합계 312.44㎡(이하 위 부분을 ‘이 사건 계쟁 부분’이라 한다)에 책상, 의자, 칸막이 등을 두고 직업전문학교 내 통로로서 이를 배타적으로 점유ㆍ사용하고 있다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 13, 14 (including each number), Eul evidence 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff, however, is the part of the building of this case.

arrow