1. The plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited to the network D, and the defendant A shall be 42,057,758 won and 17,868 among them.

1. The facts stated in the attached Form of the judgment on the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties.

According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, Defendant A is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay at the rate of 12% per annum from November 7, 2014 to the date of full payment, with respect to KRW 42,057,758 and the principal of the indemnity, KRW 17,868,836, respectively, and KRW 28,038,50, and KRW 11,912,557 per annum.

2. In full view of the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendants’ assertion of qualified acceptance of inheritance, the Defendants filed a report on qualified acceptance of inheritance as to the deceased D on February 26, 2006 with the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2006Radan131, and filed a report on the qualified acceptance of inheritance as to April 19, 2006.

According to the above facts, the defendants are legally entitled to inheritance as the heir of the network D. Thus, the defendants are responsible for the performance of the obligations acknowledged before the plaintiff within the scope of inherited property as the heir of the network D. Thus, the defendants' defense pointing this out has merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.