logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.19 2018고단2357
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On August 3, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 3, 2018 and two years of suspension of execution was decided on August 11 of the same month.

[2] No person of the 2018 Highest 2357 shall intermediate another person's communications or provide it for another person's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator.

Nevertheless, around February 15, 2018, the Defendant opened a cell phone from F that became aware of through the opening of the instant coffee shop in front of the D elementary school in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and received a proposal from F that he would give 20,000 won per the first instance trial, he opened a cell phone (G) in the name of the Defendant, and transferred one of the two depths to F.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

No person of "2018 Highest 2893" shall intermediate a third party's communications through telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, on February 20, 2018, the Defendant opened his cell phone from F in the French area in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and opened his cell phone from F and opened the cell phone in the name of the Defendant, and opened the cell phone (H) in the name of the Defendant, and transferred one heart to F using Kwikset service.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, text of judgment, and search of Supreme Court Cases "2018 High Court Order 2357";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Each report on internal investigation (No. 9,13 once a year);

1. Reference materials: "2018 Highest 2893";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. The K's statement;

1. The investigation report (No. 11 once a year) 1.

arrow