logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.17 2017가합401969
손해배상(기)
Text

1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant C is KRW 136,800,000 and 5% per annum from August 10, 2018 to August 17, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendants concluded a sales contract. According to the Plaintiff’s respective sales contract (No. 1-1-6), the Defendants filed questions as to whether Plaintiff B is the buyer on the grounds that Plaintiff B entered “A and five persons” in the buyer column of each of the instant sales contract (A, No. 1-1-6), but considering the witness O’s testimony and witness testimony and the overall purport of oral argument, Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff B is the same as Plaintiff B’s spouse. According to the Plaintiff’s assertion, Plaintiff B purchased each of the instant land in which Plaintiff B intended to build five buildings on the land of this case, and entered the name of “A and five persons,” and it is reasonable to view that Plaintiff B, along with the Plaintiff’s above sales contract, purchased the land in which Plaintiff B purchased the land in which Plaintiff B and five persons are “B,” and indicated the Plaintiff’s remaining shares in the name of “A and five persons,” and the Plaintiff’s remaining shares in the land in the name of “A and five persons,” No. 201-6,21-214,20,200,21,200.

B purchased KRW 308,00,000, and KRW 54 square meters of I forest land in KRW 30,000,000, and on the same day, Defendant C purchased KRW 228,400.

arrow