1. The Defendant has the executory power of No. 312, 2017, issued by the notary public C Office against the original and flowers Co., Ltd.

1. Since each movable property indicated in the separate list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the above article by compulsory execution based on an executory exemplification of a notarial deed as stated in Paragraph (1) of the order against the original corporation, the original corporation, etc.