1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following cases. Thus, it shall accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

With regard to “(f) appraisal” of 14 lines of the decision of the first instance court, the following details are added to (g) appraisal (the result of a request for the supplementation and supplementation of the trial) under the 4th 19 line of the decision of the first instance court (the result of a request for appraisal by the first instance court), and the nuclear escape under the 2-3 and 3-4th 14 lines of the judgment of the first instance court (the result of a request for appraisal by the court of first instance) is close to the opinion of her happiness, and there is no objective basis to deem that the accident of this case

- The escape of the Gyeongdo from Nos. 5-6 and 6-7 of the Gyeongdo is confirmed, but it is close to the opinion of her running away, and there is no objective ground to deem that the accident of this case has deteriorated.

- If the symptoms were discovered or worse due to the accident of this case, it cannot be distinguished whether the symptoms are symptoms caused by the chromatic saf.

- The symptoms of the instant injury seems to have deteriorated due to the shock in the state of the sloping symptoms.

The fourth 20th 20th 20th of the judgment of the first instance court was “the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the head of the Ansan Hospital at the Korea National University” as follows: “The result of the request for the examination of medical records by the court of first instance to the head of the Korea National University, and the result of the request for the examination of the supplementation of medical records by the court of first instance to the head of the Korea National University;” and “the result of the request for the examination of the supplementation of medical records by the court of first instance to the head of the Korea National University;” the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that there was a proximate causal relation with the instant injury as the instant injury was caused by the instant accident or

① The instant accident was an accident that fell from the height of 3 to 4 meters, and at the time.