1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim for addition and alteration in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for cases where the basic facts are written or added as follows: (a) and (c). Therefore, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the end of the second to the end of the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, the second to the second part shall be followed as follows:

The plaintiff is a patentee of the following patented inventions (hereinafter referred to as the "patent of this case"):

(1) Invention name: Reference date / Registration Date / Patent registration number: October 17, 2004; / Claim No. 10-063788 of the scope of claims / (2) No. 10-063788 of October 17, 2006; / Claim No. 1 and 8 (2) of the scope of claims / 10-06378 of the scope of claims are not subject to determination; / Claim No. 1 / Notice No. 8 of the scope of claims / Where multimedia data concurrently are input of data from outside and transmitted as a means of work control; and the result of processing is sent to the outside in accordance with the above means of work control; the multimedia data transmitted from the above means of work control are divided into a large number of means of work, one of which is processed in the method of processing, one of which is processed in the method of processing, one of the two methods of processing, one of the two methods of processing, one of the two methods of processing, and two methods of processing.