logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고단1154
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of a leisure car in C.

On March 2, 2014, the Defendant driving the said car at around 18:20, and driving the said car at around 1366, the Southern-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, the Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government roads in front of the 1366 Egympi (Mosan-dong).

The Defendant, by negligence in contravention of the signal at the time, got the victim D (the age of 22) who was a victim of a crosswalk where he gets on a matobbba and passed the crosswalk, into the front part of the driver's car and let the victim go beyond the road.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from the above occupational negligence by causing the victim to suffer from the body felbine felling accompanied by the left-hand felball, which requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accidents in Type 1 (Death resulting from Traffic Accidents) [Judgment of sentence] None of the basic area (4 to 10 months] [Judgment of sentence] of the victim [Judgment of sentence] The degree of injury to the victim was very serious and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim, but the automobile comprehensive insurance was purchased, while the victim was also insured, and the victim committed an error by breaking a pedestrian crossing, etc., shall be determined as per the order.

arrow