logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.04.23 2019나57807
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of this Court is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 1, except that the court renders “ September 9, 2013” of the 7 lines from the fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance to “ September 19, 2013.”

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On March 10, 1913, R (the main cause of the Plaintiff’s primary claim A) donated each of the following: (a) R (the head of Q (the head of Q) transferred both to the large house on a large scale around March 10, 1913; and (b) Y-gun, Y-gun, Y-362 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”) and part of 270 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest part”) as indicated in the purport of the claim (i) and part of 270 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest part”), c (iv) and 352 square meters (hereinafter “the instant ditch part”).

B) After that, S used the part of the above woodland in possession. After the death of S, U, South, succeeded to the right to claim ownership transfer registration with respect to the above woodland part and ditches part, and after the death of U, the plaintiffs succeeded to it as stated in the inheritance portion of the plaintiffs, respectively. Meanwhile, the right to claim ownership transfer registration with respect to R under the above donation contract was finally succeeded to the part of the forest of this case to the defendant L. As to the part of this case, the right to claim ownership transfer registration with respect to the above donation contract was finally succeeded to the defendants as stated in the inheritance portion of the defendant in attached Table 3. The plaintiffs were finally succeeded to the defendants as stated in the inheritance portion of the defendant in attached Table 3.) Accordingly, the plaintiffs sought against the defendants on March 10, 1913 that the plaintiff and the defendant should implement each procedure for ownership transfer registration with respect to the part of the forest of this case and the part of the ditch part of this case according to their respective shares of inheritance by the plaintiff and the defendant. 2)

arrow