logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.11 2017누71781
건축(신축)신고불가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the "refinite concrete map" of the second part shall be the "refinite concrete structure".

The second 7 to 8th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.

The part of "building area" in the 5th judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted.

The judgment of the first instance court, “ is a building report,” and “a building report is a building report, and as seen earlier, a house with a total floor area of 56.75 square meters and a total floor area of 56.75 square meters on the ground of 168 square meters on the land located prior to the instant partition around 1999, and around that time, 8.79 square meters was newly built on the land of 168 square meters in Seongdong-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and the Plaintiff purchased the instant land on June 10, 2015, which was about 15 years after the date of voluntary auction.”

The 7th judgment of the first instance court is close to the "transaction" in the 6th judgment of the court of first instance as "distance".

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow