logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.06.15 2018고단1100
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving Obane.

On March 31, 2018, the Defendant driven an over-to-face 18:40 on March 31, 2018, and proceeded along the 6-lane of light village in the direction of the Gyeonggi Manpower Development Institute, along the 7-lane of light village from the direction of the Gyeonggi Manpower Development Institute, to the 7-lane of light village.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights and crosswalks are installed, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed for the person engaged in the off-to-land driving service and prevent the accident in advance by driving safely according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the right-hand bridge of the victim C (5 ) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the left-hand side of the mast by negligence in contravention of the red signals signals.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the pelpelfeb, which requires approximately five weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Images of CCTV accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is less than the degree of negligence of the defendant for the occurrence of the accident in this case and the degree of injury of the victim therefrom, the defendant recognized the crime in this case and reflects his mistake, there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and there is no record of agreement with the father of the victim, etc. The defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are shown in the records and the changes theory in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime.

arrow