1. A judgment on a loan case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant rendered by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010dan256926 Decided August 20, 2010.

1. Although a judgment was rendered as indicated in the Disposition between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the claim in the above judgment was not repaid to the extent that the ten-year period, which is the period of extinctive prescription, from the final date of the judgment, and thus, the instant lawsuit seeking confirmation is filed for the interruption of extinctive prescription.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).