Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

At around 18:55 on October 7, 2018, the Defendant driven the above taxi to turn to the E market from the direction of the achievement police station where the distance without signal lights, etc. in front of the D cafeteria in Daegu-gun C was set to the left.

At night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering room and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver in such a case.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found the former Kwikset, which was driven by the victim F (the age of 23) of the victim F (the age of 23) due to the negligence of left the left, late and operated the former Kwikset, but did not avoid it, and had Kwikset, who received the front part of the former Kwikset, leading the latter part of the former Kwikset to the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from occupational negligence on November 26, 2018, when he received treatment from a H Hospital located in Daegu-gu Daegu-gu G on November 26, 2018, and caused the death of the victim due to her occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photographic by cutting a black image;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. The instant traffic accident occurred due to the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing his duties, which did not properly explain the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution, and there was a serious result that cannot be complied with due to the victim’s death. Therefore, the Defendant requires strict punishment.

However, it shall be considered in favor of the defendant that the defendant has recognized the fact of crime, has been divided, has agreed with the bereaved family members of the victim, and has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine.