1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. As a result of examining the grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the evidence submitted by the parties, the legitimacy of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following: (b) the part of “judgment on the grounds of claim 2.” (c) and (c) the part of “judgment on the grounds of claim 2.” (c)” among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance,

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The part of the first instance judgment 6, 10 to 7, 100, 6, 6, 100 to 7, and the next table shall be modified as follows.

However, in full view of the statements in Gap evidence No. 22 and the results of each fact-finding by this court against Gap, the repair costs incurred within the warranty period after the inspection of the apartment of this case shall be the sum of 430,057,130 won as shown below.

(F) 1: (1) 2.3 of the 3.3 of the Plaintiff’s management office: (1) 2.3 of the 1963 of the 2.3 of the 1965 of the 3.3 of the 1965 of the 196.3 of the 2.3 of the 195 of the 2.3 of the 195 of the 196.3 of the 2.3 of the 195 of the 2.3 of the 1965 of the 2.3 of the 1965 of the 3.3 of the 1965 of the 2.3 of the 3.3 of the 1965 of the 196.3 of the 3.45 of the 196.3 of the 1975 of the 2.3 of the 3.45th 5th 197 of the 5th 1964,1516 of the 10th 3 of the 196.3 of the 15.

B. At the seventh bottom of the first instance judgment.