logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단1101
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle with large cryp typ fluent in the state of alcohol leveling approximately 0.286% of alcohol level in the 2km section from the front of the Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on August 11, 2017 to the front road of the Asia-U.S. in the same 2km-ro, the U.S. P. C., the U.S. (D.) was under the influence of alcohol leveling from around 2km.

2. The defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, is the owner of a vehicle with a large coke, and the owner of a motor vehicle shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven the said vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place of the above 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of drinking alcohol, statement report on the circumstances of drivers of drinking alcohol, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of imprisonment), Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the point of operating a vehicle which is not mandatory insurance and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act [to the extent that the punishment is added up to the aggravated concurrent crimes resulting from a violation of Road Traffic Act, the punishment for which is heavier than the punishment, and the maximum term of the punishment for each crime];

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of the Defendant appears to have been repented while the Defendant confessioned all of the instant crimes, and the fact that the instant crime appears to have not resulted in damage to other persons, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

On July 2017, the defendant does not subscribe to mandatory insurance while under the influence of alcohol on July 2017.

arrow