1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the judgment regarding Defendant D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, and Q and the Defendant C, and the school foundation.

1. Basic facts

A. Regarding 469,634 square meters of Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun (hereinafter “the instant forest”), Plaintiff He owned 397/5,816 shares, Plaintiff B’s 200/5,816 shares, Defendant C’s 50/5,816 shares, Defendant C’s 105/5,816 shares, Defendant E’s 3/5,816 shares, Defendant E’s 3,716/5,816 shares, Defendant C’s 150/5,816 shares, Defendant C’s 50/5,816 shares, and U’s 200/5,816 shares, respectively.

B. Following the death of U on May 22, 2001, Defendant Q Q (the marriage report was completed with the deceased U on May 26, 1997) and Defendant J, K, L, M, N,O, P (the former name: V) inherited the net U’s share in the instant forest.

C. Following the death of T on November 25, 2006, Defendant H and I, the spouse of the Defendant D and his children, inherited the network T shares on the instant forest land. D.

According to each inheritance above, Defendant C5,950/692,104 (=50/5,816 x 119/109) Defendant E, 357/692,104 (=3/5,816 x 119/119 x 442,204,204/692,104 (=3,716/5,816 x 119/19) x 17,850/692,104 x 117/692,107 x 150/67/104 (=150/5,816 x 119/6 x 119/505 x 50/692, 104 x 119/508/106 x 19/196 x 27/106/196) shares of the Defendant C/27/16/16/4)

Plaintiff

The deceased died on October 20, 2015, while the lawsuit of this case was pending, and among the successors, S (hereinafter “Plaintiff S”) solely succeeded to the 397/5,816 shares of the Plaintiff’s forest land in this case, and took over the litigation of this case.

【In the absence of any dispute, there is a number of evidence of Gap 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8 through 12.