A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 14, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Seoul Western District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

Around 03:00 on May 10, 2020, the Defendant driven a C Kan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-kn-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Report on the status of driving under the influence of the defendant's legal statement, the circumstantial statement of the driver under the influence of the driver under the influence of the driver under the influence of the driver under the influence of drinking;

1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: (a) considering the circumstances leading up to the control of drunk driving in this case (the discovery at the road and crackdowns on 112 declarations); (b) the amount of alcohol concentration in blood; (c) the defendant’s mistake reflects his fault; (d) the interval between previous years of drunk driving and previous years of drinking driving; and (e) the fact that there is no criminal record other than the previous criminal records of drunk driving in 2000; and (d) the most liable for supporting his family; and (e) other factors of sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, the background leading to the crime