1. It is confirmed that the shareholder's rights for each of the shares listed in the separate sheet were against the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

On December 12, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into a title trust agreement with the Defendants on each of the shares listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the shares in this case”) owned by the Plaintiff, and the fact that the said shares were listed in the name of the Defendants in the name of the Defendants, is not a dispute between the parties.

In accordance with the above facts, the shareholders' rights of each of the shares of this case in the name of the defendants are deemed to exist to the plaintiff, and there is a benefit of confirmation in this case where the defendants dispute on the above facts.

As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking confirmation of shareholder's rights for each of the shares of this case is with merit.

As to this, the Defendants promised to give the Defendants an incentive to part of the shares held in title trust according to their contribution ratio if the Plaintiff appeared very high in D Co., Ltd., and asserted that the Defendants were unable to comply with the Plaintiff’s claim, since they did not pay the said incentive even though they believed the Plaintiff and obtained a considerable benefit by doing their best in the above company.

The above assertion is not acceptable, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion by the defendants.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of all.