logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.18 2017고정50
건강기능식품에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who runs the business of selling functional health foods under the trade name of “C” in netcheon City B.

1. No person who violates the Health Functional Foods Act shall advertise false or exaggerated labeling or advertising concerning the name, raw materials, manufacturing methods, nutrients, ingredients, methods of use, quality, tracking and management of history of health functional foods, and other relevant matters;

Nevertheless, on October 26, 2016, on the Internet homepage (D) of the above C, the Defendant published the content that “E is capable of directly taking in the source amount,” and that “When using in the upper part, it is appropriate to directly take in the upper part, in the upper part, image, fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral and antisculic gral gralculic gral gralculine, anti-gral gral gral gralral gral gral gralm, anti-gral gral gral gralm, gral gral gral, gral gral gral, gral gral grh, gral gral gral gral gral gral gr.”

As a result, the Defendant advertised that the name, raw materials, manufacturing methods, nutrientss, ingredients, etc. of functional health foods have efficacy and efficacy in preventing and treating diseases, or that there is possibility to confuse them as medicine.

2. No person who violates the Food Sanitation Act shall place any indication or advertisement that is likely to mislead or confuse as functional health foods with regard to the name, manufacturing method, quality, and nutrition labelling of foods, etc.;

At the end of the above day, the Defendant posted the “F” that the Defendant sold on the Internet homepage (D) of the above C, as if it had an effect on the “breath, chronic, and snow soft.”

As a result, the Defendant indicated and advertised that the name, manufacturing method, quality, and nutrition labelling of food, etc. may be mistaken or confused as functional health foods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. C-C-fafics and photographs;

arrow