The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

around 08:00 on January 12, 2016, the Defendants were gathering the above “E” restaurant in front of the Seoul Mapo-gu DD reconstruction area, and the F, the executive officer of the Seoul Western District Court, had the title of enforcement of the judgment No. 2015 group 229153 grouped, Seoul Western District Court, and the Defendant A had the intention to execute the above “E” restaurant, and the Defendant A had the intention to execute theway floor and scams, such as chairs, food, and glass, which were in front of the restaurant. The Defendant B had the intention to jointly take the floor and scambling with it, and had the intention, food, glass, etc. collected to the executive officer of the way floor and scambling.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of enforcement officer F belonging to the Seoul Western District Court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the notice of real estate delivery (1/7) and the protocol of execution of the delivery of real estate (1/12 (1/12)

1. The Defendants: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of the performance of official duties cannot be deemed as a crime that undermines the function of the state public authority; however, the Defendants did not directly go to the body of the parts including the enforcement officer at the time of the removal execution; in the case of Defendant A, G has an aspect of committing any contingent crime in the course of protesting against the enforcement officer at the scene of the removal execution; Defendant B, in the case of Defendant B, led to a crime under the circumstances where the removal of his restaurant was completed at the end of the time of the removal execution; Defendant B is also at the end of the period where the removal was completed; Defendant B is also at the end of the period where the removal was carried out; Defendant B is at the end of the period where the removal was carried out; Defendant B is also at the end of the period where the correction was carried out; Defendant B is at the end of the period where the correction was carried out; Defendant B