logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.31 2016구합23471
영업자지위승계신고반려처분 취소
Text

1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on November 1, 2016 rejecting the report on succession to business status shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From 2002 to 202, B is entitled to the ownership of land and buildings and the acquisition of the business thereof (hereinafter “instant land”).

) Five-story buildings of reinforced concrete structure and its ground reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”)

2) In the instant building, the instant building had been engaged in accommodation business (general) with the trade name “D” (hereinafter “instant accommodation business”).

(2) On February 3, 2012, the auction procedure was initiated as Daegu District Court Kimcheon-Support E on the instant land and building. On February 21, 2014, the Plaintiff was awarded a bid of KRW 820 million with respect to the instant land and building at the said auction procedure and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day.

Each letter (written waiver of corporeal Movables) shall be delivered to the Plaintiff as they are currently owned by the instant building and the movables owned by B, and the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 15 million to B at the same time as the delivery is made by the Plaintiff.

3. After the occurrence of the dispute between B and B on May 30, 2014, the Plaintiff agreed to acquire movable property owned by B in the instant building in the amount of KRW 15 million between B and B, and drafted a letter as follows.

B. On November 10, 2014, B filed a report on the closure of business with the Defendant on November 10, 2014, stating the grounds for the instant accommodation as “the closure of business due to an auction of the place of property”, and was accepted as “auction” on the same day.

C. In the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone, the instant building is located in the relative cleanup zone among the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones prescribed by the School Health Act, and the Plaintiff applied for prohibited acts and cancellation of facilities in the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone for operating the lodging business on June 29, 2016 to the head of the education and cleanup zone of the relevant building after completing remodeling works for running the lodging business in the instant building.

arrow