logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.16 2014가단31209
건물인도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) an indication of the annexed drawings among the geological floors of the building indicated in the annexed real estate;

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff’s order No. 1-A to the Defendant on December 31, 2013.

A building specified in paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as “instant house”) is leased with a lease deposit of KRW 2 million, monthly rent of KRW 220,000,000, and the lease period from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2016. Around that time, the Plaintiff delivered the instant house. Since the Plaintiff was unable to receive a rent from the Defendant from March 1, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant on May 23, 2014, which included an indication of intent to terminate the said lease on the ground of a rent, and it can be acknowledged that the said content certification reaches the Defendant around that time.

According to the above facts, since the above contents certification reached the defendant and the above lease contract was lawfully terminated at that time, the defendant is obligated to deliver the house of this case to the plaintiff and pay the difference between March 1, 2014 and March 220,000 won per month to the completion of delivery of the house of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow