logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.04.08 2015고단582
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

On December 5, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with alcohol level of 0.196% while under the influence of alcohol level around 23:40 on December 5, 2015 without obtaining a driver's license, and driven the same four-lane road in front of C in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, along three-lanes from the national pension shooting distance range to the national pension shooting distance range.

At the same time, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the front side and accurately manipulate the various devices of the vehicle such as steering and steering system to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of the victim E (Woo, 46 years old) who was under the influence of mast signal due to negligence, and was under the influence of the Defendant, and then was under the influence of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the said rocketing passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim E, such as catum, fat, etc. in need of three weeks of treatment, from the victim F (the age of 38) who was on board the damaged vehicle, the injury of catum fat, etc. in need of three weeks of treatment, from the catum fat, which requires two weeks of treatment to the same G (the age of 8) and from the injury of catum and fatum fatum fat in need of two weeks of treatment to the same H (the age of 7).

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, as a person holding B rocketing car, was prohibited from operating a vehicle on the road which was not covered by mandatory insurance, but operated the said vehicle as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The E-Written Statements

arrow