logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.05.28 2014나1688
추심금 및 사해행위취소
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' claims extended in the trial, is as follows.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs' claim confirmation and collection order 1) B against the plaintiff Eul is the D apartment of 239 households, Dong-dong 239, Dong-dong, 17, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and 17 (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

) A new corporation is an executor of the new corporation and Dongdo Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Dongdo”).

(2) On September 11, 2007, Dongdo had contracted the instant construction from B, and on October 30, 2007, Dongdo entered into a contract with a new comprehensive construction company (hereinafter “regular comprehensive construction”), a new construction company (hereinafter “fixed comprehensive construction”), and around that time, the Plaintiffs entered into a new subcontract and entered into a new construction project with a fixed comprehensive construction company and a new subcontract.

Plaintiff

(1) On March 29, 2013, A Jeonju District Court 201Da1301, 201, 388,482,866, 201, 1301, 2071, 133,174, 071, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 1301, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 201, 1301, 1301, 206, 206, 205, 203, 205, 203, 301, 205, 206, 205, 203, 2013, 306, 2013, 2014, 363,2, 361,2,

11. Joint and several sureties for a seller in charge of sale in cases of joint and several sureties and part payments of loans under a loan agreement by the representative director;

arrow