logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.25 2017고단3065
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records】 On June 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for and without labor for one year and six months in the field of fraud in the Gwangju District Court Branch.

8. 17 The above judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal facts】 Even if the Defendant did not have certain occupation or profit at the end of June 2016, the Defendant introduced his name as “D” to the victim C, who became aware of his name at the club, and operated the skin and the telecom.

A false statement was made.

1. On July 30, 2016, the Defendant, using the Kakao Kakao Stockholm message from the Kakao Kakao Kakao, on July 30, 2016, was placed in Daejeon under a contract with the Defendant.

If the President of the Customer send KRW 500,000 to the Account, he will do so in Seoul.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not intend to conclude the above contract, and did not intend to receive money from the injured party to use it as personal living expenses, etc., and did not have any intent or ability to immediately repay it to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received the remittance of KRW 500,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of E used by the Defendant.

2. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around August 1, 2016, in the front page of the victim’s residence in Seongdong-gu Seoul Seongdong-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was placed in the detention house in the victim’s house without paying the amount of KRW 1 million out of five million.

It shall be repaid no later than August 8 on the loan of money.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant did not want to pay a fine at the time, and intended to use money as personal living expenses, etc. from the victim, and did not have the intent or ability to pay it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, took over KRW 1 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) in the name of E used by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Judgment.

arrow