(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.17 2018나22106

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.17 2018나22106

물품대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is running a business such as plastic material wholesale business with the trade name of “C”, and the Defendant is running a gold-type business with the trade name of “D.”

B. On June 9, 2017, the Plaintiff prepared a trading list stating that plastic materials of the item “302IR” (hereinafter “instant one”) are supplied to the Defendant; on June 16, 2017, a trading list stating that the Plaintiff shall supply 1,500 kilograms of the instant one material to the Defendant; on June 23, 2017, a trading list stating that the Defendant shall supply 2,000 kilograms of the instant one material; and on June 23, 2017, an electronic tax invoice was issued to the Defendant based on the quantity and unit price of the instant one material as indicated in each of the respective trading statements.

C. On July 12, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) on July 12, 2017, “GP-35” (hereinafter “instant 2 materials”) is the Defendant.

) 500km (1km unit price per 2,200 won.

2) The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the 1210,000,000 won of the instant 2 materials listed in the said Schedule were issued in accordance with the volume and unit price of the instant 2 materials listed in the said Schedule. [Grounds for recognition] The same shall apply to the absence of dispute, the evidence A Nos. 1 and 2 (including the serial number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for the instant materials 1, 2 with the same content as each electronic tax invoice issued by the Defendant, and that the Defendant should pay the Plaintiff the price of the goods for the instant materials 1, 2, and delay damages therefrom.

As to this, the defendant was supplied by the plaintiff with the 1 and 2 materials of this case, and the party to the sales contract for the 1 and 2 materials of this case is not the defendant.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2018.02.22 2017가단111959

-부산지방법원 2015.06.25 2014나14754

-울산지방법원 2016.09.08 2014가합8536

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.12 2017가단21398

-서울서부지방법원 2018.03.08 2016가단249048