logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2015가단5179548
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 57,198,510 and the period from December 14, 2013 to November 25, 2016.

Reasons

. The foregoing judgment was modified, and it became final and conclusive.

5) However, in addition to the criminal facts of the above criminal case, there were 16 cases of the same Slanders that Defendant B and the marketing employees of the above Defendant Company appear to have written comments or comments after the Plaintiff’s filing of the complaint. 6) As seen above, although there were differences by each portal, this paper made 52,714 inquiries among each portal, and among them, the NAV PP did not report as a fraud in December 13, 2013, and the NAV PP did not make it possible for the company to file a complaint with the news board as stated in the above company. The NAPP did not file a complaint with the news board as stated in the above company, and the NAPP expressed many comments that the Defendant B and the above Defendant Company’s marketing employees appear to have written comments as comments or comments.

(1) 'Sick Baws Baws *, the place is so close as to be so long as the salted fish is dried.

Other persons need not receive such a work.

(2) If a crym is found in a crym newspaper, a crym three crym.

(4) Tysiums shall be classified as Ethys.

B. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

7 The Plaintiff Company: (a) made a request for deletion of Slanders continuously discovered over the course of the period from December 18, 2012 to January 15, 2014; and (b) made a disposition of deletion on the pertinent portal site, such as NAV and Dana; (c) however, (d) the Plaintiff Company, as a marriage information company of the upper floor, was an absolute member of the advertising company.

‘The name of the Plaintiff Company was processed in English initial, but most of the names of the Plaintiff Company was discovered, such as slandering letters, which can easily be identified as the Plaintiff Company.

8 After the publication of this case’s slander, the Plaintiff company visited the Plaintiff company to join the membership and new membership fees are made.

arrow