1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's dog and other dogs owned by the defendant 22,440,000 won, consolation money, and damages for delay are asked to the plaintiff's 10,000 won, and the plaintiff's 11,440,000 won for property damage caused by the above accident (=286ma x 40,000 won), since the plaintiff's 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 30,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 10,000 won for 30,000 won for 10,000 won for 30,00 won for 30.

B. 1) The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or are acknowledged by Gap evidence 4-1 and 2, Gap evidence 1-1 to 10, and the result of the first instance court’s inspection and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The Plaintiff is a person who raises a stoke in the place of raising a plastic house C’s plastic house in Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, and the Defendant is a person who raises a stoke, etc. in its neighboring areas, and there was an accident of death (hereinafter “instant accident”) by asking the stoke dog (hereinafter “the instant stoke dog”) and a few stokes raised by the Plaintiff following the Plaintiff’s intrusion into the Plaintiff’s stokehouse on November 7, 2014.

B. The above recognition.