logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고정931
주거침입
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant brought to Korea from approximately two months before C and C, and the victim D is the husband of C, and C made a false statement to the effect that “A is dead and divorced,” while she brought to Korea.

On September 23:50, 2014, the Defendant infringed upon the other person’s residence without permission, such as refusing the victim’s demand to leave, at the home of the victim, Seowon-gu E 110 Dong 207, Seo-gu, Seowon-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the husband; (b) was her husband; (c) was able to enjoy the number height of the entrance; and (d) was able to enter the house; and (c) was able to take part in the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Report on internal death (for reporting on crimes and attaching photographs to the scene), the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a marriage certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The following facts are acknowledged based on the evidence pre-guilty prior to the acknowledgement of the grounds for conviction under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order.

C, as the husband of the victim D was absent from the construction date of other areas, concealed the marital facts, and inform the defendant of the entrance door password.

On September 7, 2014, the defendant, who was the victim's house, found his house at night C on September 7, 2014 and divided the first race.

The victim considered the defendant as a customer of C and opened a entrance, but under the influence of alcohol, the defendant was able to understand as the victim, such as receiving a bridge of C, which he/she was under the influence of alcohol, from the inside.

Accordingly, the victim presented the defendant who did not comply with the eviction because he was "I am off the other's house," while "I am off the other's house."

The defendant got out of the entrance door of the victim and entered the house to the inside of the entrance.

Judgment

The recognition of the defendant;

arrow