beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates E Co., Ltd. in Gyeonggi-gu D.
1. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of the above E Co., Ltd., Ltd., established the victim C by up to April 30, 2017, three Red Sea Lives, in the form of “Seoul Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, in the G, which is the basic form of G 50 million won.”
50% of the installation cost is changed in advance.”
However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant was using the Defendant’s outstanding amount, operating expenses, living expenses, etc. of the Defendant’s company, which was located in H, which was in the Red Sea Sea Hasp, upon receiving the payment from the injured party; and (b) the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to establish the Red Sea Hasp, even if he received the payment from the injured party.
Around November 23, 2016, the Defendant was issued 27.5 million won to the post office account (I) in the name of E Co., Ltd. from the victim by deceiving the victim as above and deceiving the victim.
2. On February 30, 2017, the Defendant additionally installed two parallels of 9 square meters in the basic form in KRW 34 million to the victim’s “G Singing-type 3,40 million” in the “G Sing-type F of Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun.”
As before the previous ruling, 50% of the amount of installation should be settled in advance.
However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant was using the Defendant’s outstanding amount, operating expenses, living expenses, etc. of the Defendant’s company, which was located in H, which was in the Red Sea Sea Hasp, upon receiving the payment from the injured party; and (b) the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to establish the Red Sea Hasp, even if he received the payment from the injured party.
Around February 28, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim settle the amount of KRW 18.7 million with a credit card in the name of the wife JJ of the victim, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to that amount.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each statement protocol with K and C;
1. C Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing filing of complaint;
1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts.