1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

An intervenor in the status of a party to the instant ruling is a corporation that engages in financial business, such as deposits, loans, and insurance, with 400 full-time workers employed, and the Plaintiff is a person who entered the Intervenor on April 11, 2013 and has worked as a financial telesing worker at B points.

On March 24, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted a resignation letter to the head of the branch office B (hereinafter “the resignation letter”) on March 24, 2015. On the same day, the Intervenor accepted the resignation letter of this case on the same day, and issued a personnel order to appoint the Plaintiff as of March 24, 2015.

(2) On April 3, 2015, the Gyeonggi Regional Labor Relations Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s petition for remedy on the ground that the Plaintiff’s employment relationship between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor was agreed upon by accepting the Plaintiff’s declaration of resignation in accordance with the submission of the instant resignation on June 1, 2015.

On July 6, 2015, the Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the above initial inquiry tribunal by the National Labor Relations Commission, applied for reexamination to the National Labor Relations Commission on July 6, 2015, but was dismissed on the same ground as the initial inquiry tribunal on November 9, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination” (hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination”). [Grounds for recognition”) did not dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the purport of the entire arguments and arguments as to the legitimacy of the instant decision on reexamination, and the Plaintiff raised issues as to the facts of sexual harassment on several occasions in the workplace, and the intervenor concluded that the intervenor did not engage in sexual harassment on the part of the perpetrator. On the other hand, the Plaintiff, who is the victim, was issued to another branch.

Since then, the plaintiff is recommended to resign continuously and is paid a bonus.