logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고단897
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 18, 2002, Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) in the Seoul High Court on April 18, 2002, and the parole period was terminated on November 29, 2003 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period was terminated on December 21, 2003. On December 5, 2008, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Incheon District Court on September 24, 2009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 24, 2011.

Defendant

B On August 1, 2008, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months for fraud, and the judgment was finalized on August 9, 2008, and on June 23, 2010, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and the judgment was finalized on December 24, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant H is the Chairperson of the (State)J operated under the name of the guest rooms and the sales business of the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I, Defendant A was the Chairperson of the (State) K operated under the name of the sales agency business of the said I, Defendant B was the representative director of the said State, and Defendant B was the representative director of the said State.

On March 197, 197, the above I received approval of a business plan as a main apartment and was suspended without the progress of the construction business due to the business owner's default, and it was a situation where the construction business was suspended due to the change of the type of business to a condominium that was being promoted.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, as the above stateJ and the state K ordinarily promote the group of collective condominiums that are being carried out in the same church, have a large profits when the business is carried out. However, the Defendants, as if they can obtain a large profit from the above investment, have the victims who attend the same church, would be able to acquire money by fraud, as they would be able to obtain a large profit.

On November 9, 2006, the defendants are five floors of the Mwit-gu L, Seocheon-si.

arrow