logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.08 2017구합102654
세부시행계획취소
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On January 23, 2015, the defendant Mayor issued a public notice of the distribution plan for D and E within the Daejeon Metropolitan City development-restricted zone, with the content of "public notice of the distribution plan for D and E within the development-restricted zone," with the content of the distribution plan to establish D and E within the development-restricted zone of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, in 15. The defendant head of the Gu issued a public notice of the distribution plan for D and E within the development-restricted zone of the Daejeon Metropolitan City, with the content of the distribution plan for D and E, with the content of the distribution of D and E within the development-restricted zone of each three.

Accordingly, Plaintiff A filed an application for designation of E in a development restriction zone with the head of the Defendant to operate E (I) from the Daejeon Seo-gu H and 1 parcel, Daejeon U.S. G, and the head of the Defendant head of the Gu selected the Plaintiffs as E business operators in the development restriction zone through lottery.

On November 7, 2016, the Defendant Mayor issued a public announcement of the establishment of an E-Implementation Plan for E-Implementation Plan within a development-restricted zone, stating that he/she may install D and E in the development-restricted zone of Daejeon Metropolitan City on 15 on November 7, 2016, and that six of them shall be distributed in the flexible Gu, three of which shall be distributed to Dong-gu, Jung-gu, and Jung-gu (hereinafter “instant Disposition 1”). Accordingly, on February 3, 2017, the Defendant head of the Gu issued a public announcement of the establishment of an E-Implementation Plan within the development-restricted zone of which the number of E-distribution within a development-restricted zone is four (excluding the Plaintiff).

(hereinafter “Disposition No. 2 of this case”). [This case’s Disposition 2 of this case’s ground for recognition] . [This case’s ground for recognition .] . 【No. 1 to 2 evidence, Eul’s evidence No. 1 to 3, Eul’s evidence No. 1, and the whole purport of the pleading, and a lawsuit seeking revocation of the legal nature of the lawsuit of this case’s whole purport of the pleading shall be filed within 90 days from the date on which it becomes aware of the cause of revocation, etc.

arrow