logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.28 2017고단3587
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall pay 1,350,000 won to the applicant by fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated “F” in the lessee column of the “Leita lease agreement” that reads “F” from “Drena” to “Drena” during the period from December 24, 2016 to December 27, 2016, around the Gyeonggi-do Agricultural High School in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do; (b) signed the agreement next to the said agreement.

As a result, the suspect has set forth one chapter of the F’s “Leita Lease Contract” in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, exercised the “Drenk Lease Agreement” in the F’s name, as stated in paragraph 1, as if it were a document duly formed with G employees of “Drenk” who knew of the fact.

3. Around March 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driven a vehicle EK5 vehicle without a driver’s license in the section of approximately 27 km from around 398, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, the Gangseo-gu, the Gangseo-gu, Seoul, to the roads near the 398 Home Stacker Station, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, to the 16-ro, Seongbuk-ro, Seoul, the 48-ro, the 16-km road.

4. Fraud;

A. On March 2017, the Defendant would give a siren to K5 passenger cars in the Rober and the Korean car page.

On March 26, 2017, a notice was posted to the purport that “A e 5-month car is not used by the victim C who reported and contacted the above posted in the Seongbuk-ro 48-ro 162 apartment underground parking lots, Seongbuk-gu, 2017, and changed the 3-month siren cost. The false statement was made to the purport that “A e french is.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to lend the said car to the victim because the Defendant received the said car rental fee from the injured party, as he was planning to run the said car out of the said car.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 1,350,000 won from the community credit cooperative account (H) in the name of the defendant in the same place from the victim, and from that time, he/she from that time.

arrow