The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The victim G (hereinafter “victim”)’s statement cannot be trusted.

B. The Defendant did not commit the instant crime.

C. Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which found the victim's statement as evidence and thereby adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. The judgment of the court below 1) The court below held that the victim's statement in the court below, DNA (DNA, hereinafter "DNA") of the detained suspect

As a result of personal information inquiries, the court below found the defendant guilty of the charges on the following grounds: (a) based on the evidence such as the investigation report (related to the collection of cigarette butts) and the statement fit for each of them in the response to appraisal, the site, and each image suitable for it among tobacco butts, etc.; (b) based on the evidence, "the defendant walked on July 11, 2014, F apartment 316 dong-gu, Gwangju, 2014; (c) the victim who walked about 316 dong-gu, F apartment as of July 11, 2014; and (d) the victim's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k, and k k.

① According to the above evidence, a criminal spits tobacco from the victim’s side to the victim, and commits an indecent act against the victim. The victim resisted against this, the victim spits tobacco above the victim’s floor, spits tobacco in the victim’s side, hear the sound of the victim, and hear the sound of the victim’s wife in the apartment.