logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2017가단5096135
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, the "creditor" is deemed to be the "defendant" for the plaintiff and the "debtor". 【The grounds for recognition】 Each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 to 4

B. According to the evidence revealed earlier, in the case of the auction of real estate B in the Seoul Central District Court’s Seoul Central District Court, as the distribution schedule became final and conclusive on February 8, 2007, the extinctive prescription period has run again from the following day. Since the instant payment order was filed on January 12, 2017, more than five years prior to the extinctive prescription period, the instant claim became final and conclusive.

2. Dismissal of the Plaintiff’s request

arrow