Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On July 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on July 1, 2017, up to the night automation 47, the Victim NH Nonghyup Bank’s New Nonghyup Branch located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant: (b) placed the No. 1 Agricultural C&C and attempted to withdraw cash; (c) obstructed the device; and (d) requested an emergency call, but did not immediately mislead the device; (c) laid down the emergency call fire that was adjacent to the ATM flag; and (d) laid down the “fatch, a bar code,” which was above the ATM flag; and (d) destroyed it by making it difficult for the Defendant to repair it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (investigation into attachment of a written estimate for damage);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the criminal procedure of the order of provisional payment is for the defendant to promptly withdraw cash and drink it, and it is thought that the emergency dispatch service for "ATM instrument that has caused an obstacle that does not withdraw cash," was delayed, and it is not for the crime of this case, but for the purpose of stealing money (the crime of this case, it seems that there is no possibility that money in the ATM instrument might be leaked out of the outside due to the crime of this case), the degree of damage is relatively relatively relatively less, and the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant from the beginning, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine from the beginning, for the victim's death and as soon as possible, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment or any heavier punishment, and the defendant did not have any power to be sentenced before the crime of this case, and the defendant did not have any last record of punishment for the crime of injury after 209.