All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (two years of imprisonment and one excessive confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant runs deeply against the wrongness of the defendant.

When both the defendant and the victim have breathed their hairs in the state of alcohol, the circumstances that the victim led to a contingent crime while fighting with his body will also be considered.

The victim does not want to punish the defendant.

The victim has committed a crime due to his mistake while the victim was in the trial, and even after the release of the defendant, the defendant is able to live together with the defendant, and the defendant wants to take the action against the defendant.

The defendant did not have a threat to him due to after-school violence that has been experienced in the time of middle and high school students, and has a tendency to prevent him/her from being imprisoned due to psychological instability when he/she withdraws from alcohol.

Social ties are relatively clear, and there are no criminal records of the same kind of violence.

However, the victim's chest and clothes that can cause danger to the life of the defendant are more serious than knife in the road, and part of the victim's long-term is overfinite so that the victim's entrance operation is conducted as acutely infinite, and the degree of damage is not somewhat weak.

The defendant left the scene immediately after the crime was committed, and the victim voluntarily reported to 119 and transferred to the hospital is not good after the crime was committed.

In 2018, the Defendant committed the instant crime against the victim even though he was sentenced to a punishment in the first instance court, but was sentenced to a suspended sentence for reasons such as not wanting to be punished, etc.

The victims were intellectual disability Grade 3, and they were living together on the premise of marriage with the defendant.

The age, character and conduct of the defendant;