(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.04 2016고합585

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.04 2016고합585

현주건조물방화미수

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:00 on April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had the victim E in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City with the body from the Furbur 206, which was operated by the victim E; (b) had two readys in advance, put them into the plastic stop box, put them into a single-use stop box; (c) locked out; and (d) had a large number of smokes in the room, flabing the water into the toilet, embling it into the toilet and embling it into the toilet; and (c) had the above stop flab, dumping it into the toilet, and damaged the repair expenses by putting about 10 cm amount of 10 cm away from the front floor of the Maurbur gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Witness E;

1. Report on occurrence of a case causing the damage to property;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (100,000 won per day);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of suspended sentence;

1. Scope of punishment by law: A fine not exceeding seven million won;

2. Non-application of the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply as the person selects a fine.

3. Determination of sentence: A fine of one million won, and the suspended sentence are the crime of this case in that the defendant put a bomb in a burg for the purpose of committing suicide in his body, attach a fire to the burg, thereby damaging the burging burg and the floor of the burging burg with a fire, and the crime of this case may cause damage to a large number of human life and property that carry the burging fire if any.

However, the Defendant, while making a confession of the instant crime, made a statement that he was repented in the truth.

The Defendant is an initial offender who has no criminal record.

The Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime, with due diligence, economic pressure, etc., and the Defendant seems to have committed the instant crime.

The defendant will pay 50,000 won to the victim.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고합418

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2018.10.11 2018고합25

-서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.09.16 2020노78

-부산고등법원 2016.05.25 2016노101

-대구지방법원 2016.10.07 2016고합361